Editorial: How to develop a quality research article and avoid a journal desk rejection

The desk rejection of submitted articles can be a hugely frustrating and demotivating process from the perspective researcher, but equally, time-consuming vital step in for Editor, tasked with selecting appropriate that meet required criteria further review scrutiny. feedback journal Editors within this editorial, highlights significant gaps understanding many academics assessment acceptance progression to stage. This editorial offers valuable “lived-in” on through lens via differing views nine leading Editors. Each Editor articulates their own perspectives reasons rejection, offering key insight researchers how align submissions specific requirements quality criteria, whilst demonstrating relevance contribution theory practice. develops succinct summary findings perspectives, timely value benefit industry alike.